Ethos pathos Logos Essay Essays - Articles, Philosophy,

To begin , Aristotle is the man who has revolutionised the ways of persuasion and how a rhetoric works today but people use both of these things for better or for worse and sometimes people don't even know when they are doing it. A rhetoric is a way to do the act of persuasion threw writing and speaking, people use a lot of figures of speech and other compositional speech when they use a rhetoric. Aristotle said that a rhetoric was like a form of art and it is true but sometimes this is used to hurt people or to make sure something doesn't come out the wrong way and is used every single day by millions of people.I think a rhetoric is good, bad or neutral depending on how you use it and alot of people dont understand that because it could be used in a deceptive way or it could be used as good so someone doesnt think wrong of someone or something. To continue, A couple of the members in my group really didn't understand how rhetorics worked or what ethos pathos or logos really did so i just explained and they eventually agreed with what i had to say. Furthermore i explained what aristotle had meant when he said It would be strange if an inability to defend oneself by means of the body [Such as by learning boxing] is shameful, while there is no shame in an inability to use speech. What this is trying to say is it wouldn't be a normal that one can only defend themself with words and not with the body itself and after saying this they finally understood what aristotle was trying to say Aristotle words things in ways that speak to the culture of where he was from and the time frame he lived in . When speaking to my group they read the other quotes and started to understand more and more about what aristotle was talking about. If i were to show this assignment to say other teachers or my parents or anyone of the age to know ethos pathos and logos they would understand what I am trying to say and this is mainly because I have tried to put aristotle's words and make them into my own but by doing this it could spark another argument with my group but for the most part that has lead to me explaining again because they lack that small bit of knowledge that they need to understand this. As aristotle does have a lot of good points of ethos pathos and logos he seems to second guess himself a lot in his past work on this topic if you go back to the days he wrote these things he was changing most things about them and himself to make sure what he was doing was the correct way and obviously he had to experience using them as well and he saw how speakers and writers of his time where using these 3 things. A thing that people do not know about these ways to persuade is one that is always left out , yes it is actually supposed to be called 4 ways to persuade. It should be Ethos, Pathos, Logos, and Kairos but because of the lack of people using this last one it was scrapped an forgotten about in a way kairos is the opportune time and/or place--that is, the right or appropriate time to say or do the right or appropriate thing, this is also known as the word with the most layers of meaning and can change a whole conversation in seconds.Kairos is mainly left out because people don't know when to find that opportune moment to use it and you must be very precise with what you say as well because this changes perspective on things such as ethos, pathos, or logos.